Archive for Toxins
Britt-Marie Tore Gard about fluoride and how it poisons the body, the article from svenskpress.se
In our society there is a belief that fluoride is good and helps dental health. This belief is in no way beneficial to society, says Britt-Marie Tore Gard.
The reason that there is fluoride in toothpaste and implement so-called fluoride rinses in schools and other places is that there is a general perception that fluoride prevents tooth decay, dental caries. We believe that it strengthens tooth enamel. Medicine Professor Olof Lindahl admits that the subject can have a compounding effect on enamel, short-sighted. In the long run, he believes however that the effect is the opposite.
Thus, it is doubtful that fluoride is actually a counter of caries. However, what is certain is that fluoride in essence, is a toxic substance, and even fatal in large amounts. Fluoride, fluoride in its negative ionic form, it is widely used in dentistry. It is also toxic and deadly to humans is estimated at an amount of 50-10 grams (based on one 70 kg). Fluoride is dangerous in large quantities. In small amounts it does not know how it affects the body, so it can not be said to be poisonous.
In some places where they had unusually low life expectancy has been possible to deduce the cause of the high content of fluorine in drinking water. It is therefore reasonable to suppose that a relatively low content of fluorine as you get in through the intake of water for a longer period is poisonous. There are also studies that a high intake of fluoride increases the risk of malformation. The studies have been done on animals and the relationship between fluoride and deformity becomes of them very clearly.
In addition to the rapid aging gives fluoride also according to many researchers at increased risk of bone cancer primarily in immature individuals. In a fluorine-rich area in India has been observed that the bone structure has deteriorated in the worst case lead to paralysis. An excessive intake of fluoride also leads according to some researchers in damage to the brain. In addition, affect the substance thyroid negative. Fluorene sits namely the cell receptor (receiver) and thus prevents the hormone T4 to enter cells and activate the T3 which triggers the production of energy. As a result, when the morbid fatigue because your body thinks it has the energy shortage. This may be a reason for disease hypothyroidism.
It is difficult to avoid fluoride as there is in drinking water, more or less depending on where you live. Therefore, there is substance in products that are based on or dependent on water, such as all forms of crops, when they are watered with water containing fluoride. Are you allergic to fluoride has therefore a major problem because it is difficult to escape the topic. To do this you have to install water purifiers and keep track of what you eat, from farm to fork, so that fluorine not be added somewhere in the process.
Not only that, through life will be exposed to a constant fluoride delivery through our drinking water and the crops watered with it, plus we also in our fluoride through toothpaste. It is recommended even by the Swedish Dental Association and the consequence is then natural that people use these products.
When experts recommend that we use a substance that is directly dangerous to us is something wrong in society. The debate about fluoride has been running long, and many have questioned the subject. Olof Lindahl did it for over 20 years ago. Makes you wonder how it is that the debate did not receive proper place in the media and the interests that will fit in the media, behind the fluorine continued honored and used. That there is not even any clear evidence that fluoride prevents tooth decay really scares even more. It is time to start questioning fluoride seriously!
Read the article in its original format here: Britt-Marie Tore Gard: Fluoride poisoning
Britt-Marie Tore Gard on dangerous sweeteners, article from svenskpress.se
We do not really know at all what we get through today's food when chemicals so frequently hidden behind the E-number. The question is why manufacturers pack their products so full of these substances. It is easy to be fooled into thinking that it is for the consumer's best to use sweeteners instead of sugar for consumers to continue eating and drinking what he or she likes, without putting on weight.
In fact, it is the producers who serve on sweeteners. Sweetness produced the chemical sense, namely cheaper than regular sugar. Thanks to lower production costs, these companies larger profits and can put a lot of money on advertising, which attracts even more people to buy their products.
But at what cost to our bodies?
Many of these funds are dangerous, some are even a danger to the environment. Such is the case with the sweetener sucralose. Scientists fear that the substance affects the aquatic animal fertility, because of large amounts coming out of the water. The fact is that the structure is very similar environmental poison DDT, and therefore has the property that remain in the wild a long time without breaking down.
Since plants can not break down substances EPA estimates that it distributed about five or six tons of sucralose in Swedish lakes and water each year. The agent is not harmless to humans but can cause the thymus gland shrinks, liver and kidney is enlarged and the production of red blood cells.
Perhaps the most controversial product, aspartame, has accor many researchers adverse effects on the body. One of the effects, and perhaps one of the reasons why food is so controversial, is that aspartame is converted to methanol (ie wood alcohol) in the body. It is true also converted fructose to get in through the fruits of methanol in the body, but for the sake of it being dangerous. The difference is that in this case, methanol bound to pectin, which also occurs naturally in fruits, which prevents the body from absorbing methanol.
Some researchers have argued that aspartame increases the craving for sugar and therefore have the opposite effect than the producers are promoting. It suggests that when the body is fooled into thinking that the latest sugar increases the amount of insulin in the blood and you crave.
Whether it's now unlikely the research would prove that neither sucralose, aspartame or other sweeteners are dangerous for man, one can not possibly know the effects of a couple of years. Therefore, we should be more careful about what we eat, we should require better labeling of products containing substances not found in nature from the beginning, topics that are actually unnatural.
Read the article in its original format: Britt-Marie Tore Gard: Dangerous sweeteners
The film Submission was released in cinemas for about 3 weeks ago. Nice to things like this attention.
In this clip from the report presents the quantities of poison from spreading from greenhouse cultivation. In this case, the data from a study carried out in water in the immediate vicinity. The levels are 1000 times higher than what is acceptable. This is NOT acceptable. Eventually, the toxins into our bodies, and I can tell you - where do they do no good!
